A report on administrative offence under Article 124 of the Code of Administrative Offences was drawn up against the Client. The Client was represented by attorney-at-law Artem Fedosin.
The court found that the disposition of Art. 124 of the Code of Administrative Offences provides for violation of traffic rules by road users and that the objective element of this offence includes damage to vehicles, cargo, roads, streets, railway crossings, road structures or other property. However, the court was not provided with any evidence of damage to vehicles or other property as a result of her actions.
Thus, there was no administrative offence under Article 124 of the Code of Administrative Offences.
As a result of the trial, the case against the Client was closed due to the absence of an administrative offence and the driver’s licence was returned.
