HomeCategoryПодаткові та митні питання

 

The Tax Service issued 5 tax assessment notices (TANs) against the Client on the basis of the act of a scheduled audit.

The lawyer of our Firm appealed against the tax authority’s decision in court.

As a result of the court proceedings, the claim was fully satisfied and all TNDs were cancelled.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the first instance court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the tax authority’s request to initiate cassation proceedings.

 

The client submitted a customs declaration of imported goods to the customs authority.

After reviewing the customs declaration and other submitted documents, the customs authority decided to adjust the customs value of the goods, which was justified by the absence of all the necessary documents confirming the customs value and the lack of objective information confirming the numerical values of the components of the customs value.

Subsequently, the customs authority determined the customs value of the imported goods using the reserve method.

The lawyer of our Bureau appealed the decision of the tax authority in court.

As a result of the court proceedings, the decision of the customs authority was declared unlawful and cancelled, and the expenses for legal assistance were recovered.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the first instance court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the tax authority’s request to initiate cassation proceedings.

 

The client generated a tax invoice (TI) and submitted it for registration in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices (URTI).

The registration of the said TI was suspended and the transaction was classified as Risk Criterion 1.

The client prepared explanations and attached relevant documents.

The regional and central level commissions refused to register the TI.

Our lawyer appealed the tax authority’s decision in court.

As a result of the court proceedings, the tax authority’s decision was declared unlawful and cancelled, and at the same time the tax service was obliged to register the Client’s TI in the URTI, as well as to pay the court fee.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the first instance court.

The Supreme Court refused to open cassation proceedings against the tax authority.